IT Portfolio Management

Demand, capacity and money, managed as one view instead of three arguments.

One integrated view of what is being asked for, what can be delivered, and what it costs to say yes.

Engagement

Advisory. Run as a one-off exercise, or set up as a standing practice with your own teams.

Who it is for

CIOs, IT leaders, PMO and finance teams, and the executives deciding what gets funded.

When people call us

Budget planning is coming, demand exceeds capacity by an unknown margin, or projects keep starting without anyone deciding what they displace.

The practice

01

Demand capture

Every request in one place: funded projects, informal asks, shadow work already underway, and the things people stopped bothering to raise.

02

Force ranking

A ranking that holds up in the room — value, risk, dependency and effort weighed together, with the reasoning recorded against each call.

03

Scenario planning

What the portfolio looks like at three budget levels, which items move, and what the business gives up in each case.

04

Business impact assessment

What each item is worth to the business, what it costs to run once it exists, and what it costs to keep deferring.

05

Demand and capacity management

The plan tested against the delivery capacity you actually have, including the people already committed to run-the-business work.

06

Budget planning and IT finance

Portfolio decisions expressed in the same numbers finance uses, so the plan survives contact with the budget cycle.

07

Architecture views early

Dependencies, duplication and platform commitments understood before a project is chartered, not discovered in delivery.

08

Project setup

Scope, sequence, owner and success measures defined at the point of funding, which is where most delivery problems are created.

09

PPM tooling

Requirements, selection and setup for the tool that holds the portfolio. Where you want the discipline run week to week, ClarityArc Vision is our own software for it.

The portfolio cycle

Demand, tested against what can actually be delivered.

  1. 01
    Capture

    Every request in one place, including shadow work and the asks people gave up making.

  2. 02
    Assess

    Architecture, dependency and duplication against each item, before anything is ranked.

  3. 03
    Cost

    The build and the years after it, in the numbers finance already uses.

  4. 04
    Rank

    Value, risk and effort weighed together, with the reasoning recorded against each call.

  5. 05
    Fund

    What survives becomes projects with owners, dates and a written trade-off.

Against capacity, not ambition

The ranked list is tested against the delivery capacity you actually have, including the people already committed to run-the-business work. Scenario planning shows leadership the portfolio at three funding levels, which moves the argument from whose project matters to what the business is willing to give up.

We capture demand from across the business, assess each item against the architecture, cost it over its life, rank it against the capacity you actually have, and turn what survives into funded projects with owners and dates.

One view, not three

Demand, capacity and money are usually managed by three groups who meet rarely: business engagement holds the requests, IT finance holds the budget, architecture holds the constraints. Portfolio management is what joins them, and the joining is most of the value.

Ranking is a conversation, not a formula

Value, risk, dependency and effort go into it. Scenario planning is what makes the conversation productive: show leadership the portfolio at three funding levels and the argument moves from whose project matters to what the business is willing to give up.

A one-off, or a practice

Some organizations need the exercise once, before a budget round or after a strategy refresh. Others need the discipline installed — the forum, the intake, the tooling, the rhythm, and the people in business engagement, finance and architecture who have to run it. Both are on the table, and technology strategy usually sets the priorities that the ranking then serves.

The application estate

Where the pressing question is what to do with the applications themselves, that is an application estate review, and it stands on its own.

What you keep

The code and the data·Your existing relationships·Approval and control·The ability to stop·The off switchWhat that means

Start with a 45-minute briefing.

No pitch. We’ll map your situation against what actually works and tell you honestly where to start.