Studio
Automations built as software — reusable, configurable and resilient to the next screen change.
Implementation. Built to a standard your own developers can extend.
RPA developers and the IT owners who inherit what gets built.
Automations were recorded rather than engineered, every process starts from scratch, or a cosmetic UI change takes three of them down.
What we build in Studio
A framework, not a recording
Transaction handling, retry, logging and state, so the second process costs a fraction of the first and both fail predictably.
Reusable libraries
Shared components for the systems everyone touches — the ERP login, the portal download, the file drop — versioned and published once.
Resilient selectors
UI targeting chosen to survive cosmetic change, with fallbacks, rather than absolute paths that break when a field moves.
Configuration outside the code
Paths, thresholds, URLs and business rules held as assets and config files, so a change does not require a developer and a release.
Source control and reviews
Projects in Git with branching, pull requests and a review standard, because an automation is software and ages like software.
Test coverage
Test Suite workflows over the paths that matter, so a change can be verified before it reaches production rather than after.
Coding standards
Naming, structure, error handling and documentation, written down and applied — which is what makes a team's work reviewable.
Developer enablement
Coaching your own developers on the framework and the patterns, where you are building capability rather than buying a build.
Recorded, or engineered.
The second process costs what the first did, unless the first was built to be built on.
- 01A recording
Clicks captured end to end. Works once, breaks on the first screen change, and teaches the next developer nothing.
- 02A framework
Transaction handling, retry, logging and state, inherited by every process after it.
- 03Libraries and configuration
Shared components for the systems everyone touches, with rules and thresholds held outside the code.
- 04Reviewed and tested
Source control, pull requests and test coverage over the paths that matter — because it is software.
We build in Studio to a standard: a framework underneath, reusable libraries for the systems everyone touches, configuration held outside the code, and test coverage over the paths that matter.
Built as software, or rebuilt every time
The difference between a demo and a programme that scales is structural. With a framework, transaction handling, retry and logging come free on every process, and a developer picks up somebody else’s work without an archaeology exercise. Without one, every automation is bespoke, and the second costs what the first did.
Selectors decide your maintenance bill
Most breakages are UI targeting that was never going to survive an update. Choosing stable anchors, avoiding absolute positions and building sensible fallbacks is unglamorous work that shows up directly in how often support is called.
Configuration is what keeps IT out of the loop
Thresholds, file paths, tolerances and business rules belong in assets and configuration, not compiled into a workflow. Get that right and a business owner changes a rule themselves; get it wrong and every adjustment is a development cycle.
What you keep
The code and the data·Your existing relationships·Approval and control·The ability to stop·The off switchWhat that means
Start with a 45-minute briefing.
No pitch. We’ll map your situation against what actually works and tell you honestly where to start.